Kai Michael Kenkel

Article published on 09.02.2021 (in English)

Abstract: This article highlights the domestic effects of the ongoing changes in United Nations peacekeeping practice on troop contributing states from the Global South. It juxtaposes scholarship on stabilization, the specific motivations of Global South troop contributing countries, and in particular the effects on civilian control of armed forces of peacekeeping participation. It argues that the “diversionary peace” hypothesis—which posits beneficial effects on civilian control for peacekeeping—has not obtained, and that current developments in United Nations peace operations will negatively affect civil–military relations in postcolonial sending countries. The text suggests avenues for future inquiry. One is the notion that stabilization may lead to a net negative effect on civilian control in unconsolidated democracies. This is due to stabilization’s increased militarization, and its turn towards objectives that mimic the counterinsurgency mandates associated with military rule in the Global South, rather than a focus on the socioeconomic well-being of local populations.

Key-words: Peace operations; United Nations; stabilization; Global South; civilian control; democratization

Full Publication: Kai Michael Kenkel (2021) Stability abroad, instability at home? Changing UN peace operations and civil–military relations in Global South troop contributing countries, Contemporary Security Policy, 42:2, 225-240, DOI: 10.1080/13523260.2021.1883276